Re: [boost] Name of namespace detail

Subject: Re: [boost] Name of namespace detail
From: Jean-Louis Leroy (jl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-12 19:34:14

> I use detail name myself. Any better names for bucket with
> implementation details?

What about `namespace private_` ? Even if access won't be controlled by 
the compiler. And also a `namespace protected_` if there are useful 
things to put there ?

Btw fusion has an `extension` namespace in addition to `detail`. It 
seems to play the same role as protected interfaces in class hierarchies.

J-L