Subject: Re: [boost] Name of namespace detail
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-13 09:15:25
Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
> > I use detail name myself. Any better names for bucket with
> > implementation details?
> What about `namespace private_` ? Even if access won't be
> controlled by the compiler.
I don't care for that only because the privacy isn't enforced and because the name has to be doctored to avoid the keyword. OTOH, perhaps you could submit that as a feature request for the next version of the standard. That is, suggest that "namespace private detail" be like an unnamed namespace, but with the facilities offered by a named namespace (scope resolution, using declarations, etc.).
> And also a `namespace protected_` if there are useful
> things to put there ?
That one doesn't make any sense to me.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk