Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: Generic Geometry Library (GGL).
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-13 09:44:40

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mateusz Loskot" <mateusz_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: Generic Geometry Library (GGL).

> vicente.botet wrote:
>>> Therefore, I would like to request a formal review and the library
>>> placed into the review queue. It is put into the Boost.Sandbox:
>> I supose that the directory has not been commited.
> The GGL is headers-only library, so the complete library is there.
> The libs is a placeholder where we are going to commit tests
> and a bunch of examples soon.

When I see a library proposed for review I expect docs, tests and examples, so I can understand the library test it, and lear from the examples.
It seems extrange to me you propose a library missing these important parts.
It seems also extrange to me it has been accepted by the review manager and the review wizards.

I supose all of you have deep reasons to do this way,

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at