Subject: Re: [boost] [system][filesystem v3]Questionabout error_codearguments
From: Peter Foelsche (peter_foelsche_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-26 19:40:49
"Peter Foelsche" <peter_foelsche_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> I suspect you have a point you would like to make about
>> the interface. If you keep the personal attacks out of the
>> statement you will be more clearly heard.
> His statement showing missing experience,
> that I think my post was fully fitting the circumstances.
> I think exploitation of C++ Exception Handling after 1996 with Windows and
> OS/2 Compilers and much later on UNIXs is such a step forward, that I
> cannot in good concience leave such a statement unanswered.
and I was also refering to the style asio library
-- exporting unnecessary functionality (like separate calls to socket() and
bind() and listen())
creating the possibility of wrong order of calls.
Originally I made another post in this newsgroup with subject "asio
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk