Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 12:24:31
John Maddock wrote:
> I'm *not* saying we should do this for 1.41, but should we have an official
> policy regarding compiler warnings and which ones we regard as "failures"?
> I realize these can get pretty busy-body at times, but if the user sees
> several pages of warnings when building Boost it doesn't look so good. So
> my suggestion would be that we have two test-runners (if we have any spare!)
> that build with warnings-as-errors, maybe:
> -Wall -pedantic -Wstrict-aliasing -fstrict-aliasing -Werror
I would remove -pedantic, but otherwise, it's a very good idea. Unfortunately,
recent discussion left me with the impression that few folks care.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk