Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 12:19:20
I would like the trunk tests and display matrix to add a couple of options
currently it includes OS, compiler, compiler version, etc.
I would like to add
a) warning level
b) optimization level
So that we testers could choose which configuration they would
like to run and have that information appear in the top row
along with the other information.
John Maddock wrote:
> I'm *not* saying we should do this for 1.41, but should we have an
> official policy regarding compiler warnings and which ones we regard
> as "failures"?
> I realize these can get pretty busy-body at times, but if the user
> sees several pages of warnings when building Boost it doesn't look so
> good. So my suggestion would be that we have two test-runners (if we have
> spare!) that build with warnings-as-errors, maybe:
> -Wall -pedantic -Wstrict-aliasing -fstrict-aliasing -Werror
> For gcc and:
> /W3 /WX
> for MSVC?
> Obviously these may prove to be far too busy-body, but is this worth
> a try?
> Cheers, John.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk