Subject: Re: [boost] [1.41.0] Beta 1 available
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 12:47:53
Beman Dawes wrote:
> Speaking of that, I notice that SourceForge has a Thumbs up/Thumbs
> rating system now.
> We need to take a look at the roughly 10% of the Boost ratings that
> get a "Thumbs down" to see what is bothering users.
I have always wanted a "rating system" on a library by
libray basis. Ideally, this would be a web page that
could be invoked for any library
library: select library
Rate 1 (unacceptable) ... 5(great) the following:
documentation (useless).(tax code)..(a pleasure to read and use)
ease of use(tax code)...(no-brainer)
response to questions/support(awol)...(right next to me)
and a summary page for each library
total number of responses
results for above questions
links to comments/pages/ar ratings.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk