Subject: Re: [boost] [1.41.0] Beta 2 plans
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-08 09:10:14
Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>> Due to the issues exposed in the "Official warnings policy?" thread,
>>>> there will be a second 1.41.0 beta, tentatively scheduled for Sunday,
>>>> November 15th.
>>>> Until Saturday, November 14th, the release branch is open for merges
>>>> of low-risk bug fixes. In particular, fixes that clear compiler
>>>> warnings are encouraged.
>>> I don't think this is a great idea at this point. Â I believe that
>>> the criteria for a release is that the release branch is strictly
>>> better than the last release. Â Setting new goals/requirements
>>> at this juncture will start a whole new round of delays and
>>> pleas for "just one more thing".
>> I must agree with Robert here. Let's stick with the original plan, get 1.41
>> out, and *then* figure out what to do about the warnings.
> Does anyone want to argue in favor of a second beta?
As soon as the final release a still a couple of days away to allow testing the
OSX 10.6/ppc64 fix I've just committed to trunk, it does not seem like second
beta is much needed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk