Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Jeffrey Bosboom (jbosboom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-10 01:14:11
Patrick Horgan wrote:
> But redundant. It's already built into gcc to do this. If you just have
> the pragma and then build with -Wsystem-headers it turns the warnings back
> on. No sense in reinventing the wheel.
But wouldn't that also cause the standard library and other actual
system headers to generate warnings? It would presumably be difficult
to pick out the Boost warnings from the standard library ones, just as
Boost users currently complain about picking out warnings from their
code amidst Boost warnings.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk