Subject: Re: [boost] Review Queue Needs Attention
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-24 17:13:01
Am Tuesday 24 November 2009 22:46:21 schrieb Simonson, Lucanus J:
> I would recommend that authors try find a review manager before they
> request a review. If no one is interested in being the review manager of a
> given library then it might be that the author mistook polite interest for
> serious interest in the determining interest phase. We can easily fix the
I don't think the fact alone that noone is currently willing to perform some
unappealing bureaucratic work (being a review manager) shows a lack of
interest in a library.
judging by the review schedule (almost no review managers), that would mean
boost isn't very interested in new libraries in general.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk