Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Queue Needs Attention
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-24 17:13:01


Am Tuesday 24 November 2009 22:46:21 schrieb Simonson, Lucanus J:

> I would recommend that authors try find a review manager before they
> request a review. If no one is interested in being the review manager of a
> given library then it might be that the author mistook polite interest for
> serious interest in the determining interest phase. We can easily fix the

I don't think the fact alone that noone is currently willing to perform some
unappealing bureaucratic work (being a review manager) shows a lack of
interest in a library.
judging by the review schedule (almost no review managers), that would mean
boost isn't very interested in new libraries in general.

http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk