Subject: Re: [boost] Review Queue Needs Attention
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-26 07:00:31
Tim Blechmann wrote:
>>>> (And a state not damned with faint praise like 'unstable' - which is perhaps
>>>> better described as 'likely_to_be_improved' rather than actively 'not stable').
>> The apache incubator might be a more appropriate inspiration than
>> Debian unstable.
> the current sandbox layout has the disadvantage, that single projects
> are present as sandbox/mylib, which do not run or compile on their own,
> but require a full set of the boost headers. in order to try out one
> sandbox library, you need to get the boost checkout/tarball and copy it
> to sandbox/mylib or vice versa ...
Just to clarify -- what is wrong with starting with checkout of 'main'
Boost tree, and then doing 2 "svn co" per any sandbox library you want
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk