Re: [boost] Review Queue Needs Attention

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Queue Needs Attention
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-26 07:18:23

>>>>> (And a state not damned with faint praise like 'unstable' - which is perhaps
>>>>> better described as 'likely_to_be_improved' rather than actively 'not stable').
>>>
>>> The apache incubator might be a more appropriate inspiration than
>>> Debian unstable.
>>
>> the current sandbox layout has the disadvantage, that single projects
>> are present as sandbox/mylib, which do not run or compile on their own,
>> but require a full set of the boost headers. in order to try out one
>> sandbox library, you need to get the boost checkout/tarball and copy it
>> to sandbox/mylib or vice versa ...
> 
> Just to clarify -- what is wrong with starting with checkout of 'main'
> Boost tree, and then doing 2 "svn co" per any sandbox library you want
> to try?

not sure, whether i understand it correctly. if i check out trunk and
sandbox/mylib to myboost/ ... then myboost would contain 2 independent
svn checkouts ... does `svn diff' show the diff with trunk or with
sandbox/mylib then?

tim

-- 
tim_at_[hidden]
http://tim.klingt.org
Nothing exists until or unless it is observed. An artist is making
something exist by observing it. And his hope for other people is that
they will also make it exist by observing it. I call it 'creative
observation.' Creative viewing.
  William S. Burroughs