Subject: Re: [boost] warning policy issue
From: Vicente Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-27 12:19:11
Paul A. Bristow-2 wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Behalf Of
>> Vicente Botet Escriba
>> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 3:52 PM
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [boost] warning policy issue
>> what do you think if, in addition to setting up the Maintenace Guidelines
>> wiki page, we setup some test that proves these guides really work?
> I'm not clear how you could cover more than the obvious cases.
> Most of these suggestions I've drawn from actual code examples, giving
> some sort
> of assurance that they work.
> We should also get feedback if they are found deficient - as in the
> starting this thread, that gives more assurance.
> If you are volunteering, be my guest ... ;-)
The advantage I see to have tests is that we could be able to see if the
guidelines work with new compiler releases.
I'll see if I have some spare time to setup these tests.
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/warning-policy-issue-tp26532651p26545335.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk