Subject: Re: [boost] [unordered] unordered_set::erase() complexity bug?
From: John Zwinck (jzwinck_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-28 17:52:29
Daniel James wrote:
> 'erase' would be better. But as a temporary measure I'll add something
> like that, you might want to file a ticket to make sure I don't forget
> and track what I do.
I have created a ticket: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3693
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk