Subject: Re: [boost] boost_extension
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-07 17:56:01
> If the problem is that the Boost review process is broken, let's try to fix
> that, not bypass it. If the process is broken, we should fix it for all
> types of contribution - small or large, extension or new library.
Don't know about broken. Boost just accepted two more libraries in the
past two months, or so. My problem is that I cannot find a review
manager. boost::gil's maintainer, incl. me, are not available.
> I am looking forward to the eventual review of your GIL IO extension and its
> inclusion in Boost. Having had a quick look at the code some time ago, I
> think it would benefit from a full review, not some sort of "fast path".
I agree, I have received great help by some individuals, but at the
end of the day I have to rely on my own resources. Trust, that's not
the best way. ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk