Subject: Re: [boost] boost_extension
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-08 04:22:20
Christian Henning wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>> If the problem is that the Boost review process is broken, let's try to fix
>> that, not bypass it. ?If the process is broken, we should fix it for all
>> types of contribution - small or large, extension or new library.
> Don't know about broken. Boost just accepted two more libraries in the
> past two months, or so. My problem is that I cannot find a review
> manager. boost::gil's maintainer, incl. me, are not available.
I think that counts as broken, if it gets to the point where you
consider alternative ways of furthering your work.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk