Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-28 12:20:35
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> But nobody has yet responded to the vital question of whether there are
> resources to support a parallel tree to trunk,
> in addition to sandbox, for what we are calling 'candidate' libraries. It
> really needs to have an identical structure,
> and tests which are run regularly, like trunk. This will encourage more users,
> who have an important, and often informed, voice in reviews.
IMO we do not need this. Candidate libraries should compile and test
against last release. We can't expect to sync all development efforts.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk