Subject: Re: [boost] Boost, Decoupled and Accelerated
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-18 11:55:26
At Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:03:31 +0000,
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > At Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:46:35 +0100, Roland Bock wrote:
> >> A question from a user and occasional contributor to the
> >> overflowing bug tracker, hoping that you can provide an answer
> >> without compromising the dramatics for BoostCon :-)
> >> How could decentralization influence the overflowing bug tracker?
> > A very good question. The most obvious thing is that projects could
> > all choose their own issue tracking systems, so nobody needs to be
> > bogged down by the slowness of a single Trac instance or tied to the
> > current stagnation of the Trac development effort.
> Could you give a few more details on how it would be organized
> at boost.org?
Exactly how Boost would be mapped onto ryppl is an open question,
though I have some specific ideas.
> Does it mean each library will organize hosting, domain, etc.
> on its own.
> Or, all libraries will still be hosted under at boost.org and
> accessible through subdomain, test.boost.org, asio.boost.org, etc.
I think that's up to us. Ryppl will allow either system, or something
-- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com