|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-18 16:42:07
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> I think, it would also make it possible to connect several backends
> with a single frontend and/or a common formatter, which was requested
> during the review.
Yeah, that would be really cool :-) . Currently I am using the logging
functionality provided by the Poco library (http://www.pocoproject.org).
They have a chaining mechanism. This also includes splitters which
distribute log records to several sub-chains.
In "my" scenario, I have a central filter (to block all trace messages,
for instance), a single formatter, a splitter and then the backends
(with their own filters).
Regards,
Roland
PS: I did not even read half of all the mails of this review, but from
what I saw, Boost.Log is going to make quite a leap if you follow up all
the suggestions and discussions. I am very much looking forward to
migrating as soon as the next version is available. Thanks for all the
time and efforts you invest in this project!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk