Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review ongoing

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review ongoing
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-19 05:03:52

On Friday 19 March 2010 04:34:04 Jamie Allsop wrote:

> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Boosters,
> > 
> > 
> > 2. The reviews and all comments should be submitted to the developers list,
> > boost_at_[hidden] and the email should have "[log]" prefix in the subject
> > to make sure it's not missed. The deadline for reviews is
> > 
> >      23:59, March 17, PST = 2:59, March 18, EST = 7:59 March 18, GMT = 10:59, March 18 MSK
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately I left on a business trip the day the review period 
> started and return this morning. I'd like to submit a late review if 
> that is acceptable. We are currently using this library in a real 
> project and so if my issues have not been addressed in other comments 
> I'd like to make sure I raise them.
> 
> I had previously reviewed at least one other log library effort and have 
> used both of John Torjo's libraries in various projects. If a late 
> review is acceptable please give me a reasonable cut-off date for 
> providing it.

Jamie,

your review will be welcome, but if possible, please focus on the new issues
you have discovered -- e.g. the state of docs and implementation is pretty
much well established, so it's only important to know how the library
fits your real use cases.

I hope to announce the review results around:

     23:59, March 24, PST = 2:59, March 25, EST = 7:59 March 25, GMT = 10:59, March 25 MSK

All follow-up comments or late reviews better be submitted at least 24 hours before this
date to be included. Is this fine with you?

- Volodya