Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process
From: Boris Schaeling (boris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 07:30:24

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:48:22 +0100, Felipe Tanus <fotanus_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> [...]It sure would be far more complex, but IMHO it is worth. Having a no
> OS specific library could be the motive in the first place for someone
> look for boost.process. What you think about try to remodeling the
> library again? Would it be nice if we manage to do it, but in the

Sounds good to me! We could look at Ilya's draft to see how he modeled the
class interfaces. And we could take the implementation from my draft as it
has been thoroughly tested on several platforms.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at