Subject: Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights
From: Christian Holmquist (c.holmquist_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 16:17:08
On 26 March 2010 10:05, Rutger ter Borg <rutger_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Christian Holmquist wrote:
> > Which libraries are in the state of no maintainer and how serious are
> > their bug lists at this moment?
> I guess there's a difference between "no maintainer" and
> "unmaintained"/"needs more attention".
Nit pickings aside, what is the immediate problem? This whole thread seems
very theoretical to me. A lot of energy put into it from many people, that
maybe could be used to improve the current state of affairs instead (i.e. by
fixing bugs in abandoned libs)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk