Subject: Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights
From: Christopher Jefferson (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 16:36:51
On 26 Mar 2010, at 20:17, Christian Holmquist wrote:
> On 26 March 2010 10:05, Rutger ter Borg <rutger_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Christian Holmquist wrote:
>>> Which libraries are in the state of no maintainer and how serious are
>>> their bug lists at this moment?
>> I guess there's a difference between "no maintainer" and
>> "unmaintained"/"needs more attention".
> Nit pickings aside, what is the immediate problem? This whole thread seems
> very theoretical to me. A lot of energy put into it from many people, that
> maybe could be used to improve the current state of affairs instead (i.e. by
> fixing bugs in abandoned libs)?
Can I just get a svn account, and start applying fixes to bugs in any libs I deem to be abandoned?