Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers

Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-15 15:58:47

> 
> 
> Maybe "fork" was bad wording considering that the code is
> not derived
> from boost. Still, as it serves as a boost replacement, I
> am saying
> that I would love to see improvements you put there to be
> put into
> boost instead, so they serve a larger audience.

This is just a question of priorities: I want to release CppCMS - I need
stable boost-like library.

1. I can't fix all boost on-my-own.
2. I can extract small parts and implement exacly what I need. So I do
   this.

So I do have my own reasons, and BTW Boost.Locale is written with
backward ABI compatibility in mind.

So once boost "stabilization" would be started as official part of
boost I'll be the first who helps.

Artyom