Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Fourth release, requesting preliminary review again
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-06 10:10:32
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/06/2010 04:14 AM, Christopher Jefferson wrote:
>> That was the idea -- to implement nothrow_integer without using
>> any exceptions at all.
> Mant libraries, including libstdc++ (the standard library in g++)
> implement support for -fno-exceptions by just calling abort() instead
> of throw. I would advise just doing that, as from my experience
> anything else turns into an unreadable mess very quickly. It is also
> reasonable to make the function called user-defined and allow
> longjmping out, under the condition memory will leak, so users should
> aim to clean up and exit, not get exceptions repeatedly.
- From my testing, that looks like the only reasonable solution. It looks
like -fno-exceptions disables throw, try, and catch -- you can't even
compile a program containing any of those statements, and putting them
in a template class or function that's never instantiated doesn't
Can I assume (or insist) that BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS will be defined if the
user wants that behavior?
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk