Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 11:33:58
On 7/20/2010 10:25 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> Honestly, if we're going to pick a totally arbitrary name, I'd
>>> prefer leaving it alone.
>> I agree. The problem we're starting with is that "bjam.exe" is not
>> correlated to "Boost.Build" at all. Replacing "bjam.exe" with
>> something totally random will only create more confusion.
> When I suggested something correlated to Boost.Build, it was
> rejected. I'm having a hard time understanding what's wanted.
Actually.. I'm kinda liking "bb". It's short and correlated. But so far
no other suggestion has resonated with me. And I agree that choosing an
totally unrelated term means renaming the entire project to that term so
that there's correlation.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk