Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe

Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: David Bergman (David.Bergman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-21 21:18:36

NOTE: this post will most probably be frowned upon and regarded as OT even though it treats other OT constructs.

Why do we have to push down whatever theist leaning we have into other people's throat?

I think it is totally inappropriate to use this forum as an evangelism channel.

I do not care if the person just use it as a social phrase or not, and am sure that the following phrase would irritate people after a few hundred repetitions:

In Muhammed we trust.

/David

Typed on an iPhone

On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> AMDG
> 
> Maurizio Vitale wrote:
>> what about fiat (as in 'lux fiat', latin for (in the beginning) light
>> was made").
>> Interestingly, in latin is also an imperative, so you can say "fiat lux"
>> as in "make light".
>>  
> 
> Actually, fiat is present subjunctive.  "light was made" would be
> lux factus est.
> 
>> seem short and probably not taken for build systems.
>>  
> 
> Again, I don't see the point of changing to a random name.
> 
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost