Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc][RFC] Pointer Plus Bits
From: Brian Bartman (bbartmanboost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-27 11:29:18
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Brian Bartman wrote:
> > As it is currently bitfield_tuple is in the boost namespace
> Why is that?
Not really sure why.
But it will be shortly within the bitfields namespace.
> > and extra parts external to the class are located within
> > the bitfields namespace.
> Presumably, bitfield_tuple is defined in the your nested namespace and
> brought into the boost namespace with a using declaration. (I haven't
> > One of the other names which came up for this data structure
> > was bit_tuple does that sound any better?
> I don't think that's good. It isn't a tuple of bits, but rather of
> arbitrarily grouped bits. Hence "bit_field_tuple" is the better name.
> Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
> Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
> Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
> IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments
> is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
> attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
> this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should
> be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any
> security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her
> employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to
> the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or
> that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
-- thanks, Brian Bartman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk