Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Ilya Sokolov (ilyasokol_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-31 07:47:53
On 30.08.2010 22:59, Boris Schaeling wrote:
> I checked now why I even had to add -lpthread if it wasn't required in
> earlier Boost.Process drafts: The new status class uses a worker thread
> to support asynchronous I/O. So yes, threading=multi is the natural
> choice. ;) Updated in SVN and in the ZIP file.
I expect bp::status::async_wait() to be used rarely enough, to some
degree where BOOST_PROCESS_NO_THREAD is justified.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk