Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Klaim (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-31 08:03:59


is this library already considered "in review"?
I don't see it in the review queue and I guess it's because this last
developpement was a SOC project.

Joël Lamotte

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 13:47, Ilya Sokolov <ilyasokol_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 30.08.2010 22:59, Boris Schaeling wrote:
>> I checked now why I even had to add -lpthread if it wasn't required in
>> earlier Boost.Process drafts: The new status class uses a worker thread
>> to support asynchronous I/O. So yes, threading=multi is the natural
>> choice. ;) Updated in SVN and in the ZIP file.
> I expect bp::status::async_wait() to be used rarely enough, to some
> degree where BOOST_PROCESS_NO_THREAD is justified.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at