Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Boris Schaeling (boris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-31 18:14:58
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:47:53 +0200, Ilya Sokolov <ilyasokol_at_[hidden]>
> On 30.08.2010 22:59, Boris Schaeling wrote:
>> I checked now why I even had to add -lpthread if it wasn't required in
>> earlier Boost.Process drafts: The new status class uses a worker thread
>> to support asynchronous I/O. So yes, threading=multi is the natural
>> choice. ;) Updated in SVN and in the ZIP file.
> I expect bp::status::async_wait() to be used rarely enough, to some
> degree where BOOST_PROCESS_NO_THREAD is justified.
I have no strong opinion. I wouldn't care but if it helps others I can add