Subject: Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 10:14:15
On 9/2/2010 12:31 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Edward Diener wrote:
>> On 9/1/2010 3:38 PM, Ralf Globisch wrote:
>>>>>> Giorgio Zoppi 09/01/10 2:17 PM>>>
>>> I don't know if there's enough space for this. There are a plenty of
>>> GUIs Framework,
>>> like Qt or wxWindows, which are more advanced.
>> wxWindows is horrendous as a modern C++ GUI library. It uses C++ as it
>> was used some 15 to 20 years ago and makes endless excuses about why its
>> dialect of C++ must never be upgraded centered around support for
>> hopelessly non-compliant C++ compilers.
>> Qt is a proprietary framework, also not using modern C++ but its own
>> in-house ideas instead, which have long ago been superceded by modern
>> C++ constructs such as in Boost libraries.
> It's not clear whether those "modern C++ constructs" bring much practical
The practical advantage is that it becomes unnecessary to work in two
different worlds, the world of Qt "extensions" and the world of modern
standard C++ with Boost. This sort of hybrid development is always more
complex than it first appears to be to program in. I personally would
prefer a modern C++ GUI based around Boost and any other modern C++
libraries as well as the constructs soon to be incorporated in the next
>> Furthermore one can not
>> create commercial applications with it without either releasing the
>> source code or paying Trolltech, or whoever owns them now, some large
>> amount of money.
> This is not true. You can use Qt for all kind of projects, including
> commercial closed-source, without paying a dime. It's under LGPL on all
> platforms, and "L" matters -- it means you are only prevented from
> making local modifications to Qt and distributing modified version.
You are correct and it was my mistake.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk