Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library
From: Daniel Pfeifer (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 12:11:04

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?"
Previous message: David Sankel: "[boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?"
In reply to: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library"
Next in thread: Cory Nelson: "Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library"
Reply: Cory Nelson: "Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library"

Am Donnerstag, den 02.09.2010, 10:14 -0400 schrieb Edward Diener:
> ... I personally would
> prefer a modern C++ GUI based around Boost and any other modern C++
> libraries as well as the constructs soon to be incorporated in the next
> C++ standard.

Who would not?

If Boost had such a library, would anyone around here even consider
using wxWidgets or Qt? Probably not?

I think then anyone should agree that such a library could be useful to
have in Boost.

Whether it is worth the effort to create such a library is a completely
different question.

cheers, Daniel

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?"
Previous message: David Sankel: "[boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?"
In reply to: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library"
Next in thread: Cory Nelson: "Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library"
Reply: Cory Nelson: "Re: [boost] Thoughts for a GUI (Primitives) Library"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk