Re: [boost] Boost Evolution

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Simonson, Lucanus J (lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-08 16:25:13

vicente.botet wrote:
>> I'm somewhat confused about "detail".  If it's an implemenation
>> detail 
>> of a particular library it should be in that library.
> 
> +1, and I this that the name space should be prefixed by the name of
> the library as ratio::ratio_detail. 

Why?  boost::ratio::detail is distinct from boost::polygon::detail and unambiguously so.  Namespace is the preferred style option to naming convention with prefixes to prevent ambiguity/collisions, I see no reason to use both.

Regards,
Luke