Subject: Re: [boost] [1.45] Where are we in the release process?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-29 14:59:40
Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 5:03 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> I'm asking because someone's just assigned a Boost.Interval issue to me:
>> Seems like there is a trivial fix in Trunk, but as the library appears
>> not to have been maintained for while, it looks like none of the patches
>> that some folks have applied to Trunk have been merged to release :-(
>> On a related note, I believe there are quite a few old and unmerged
>> changes to the Utility lib as well.
> According to the schedule Beman sent around earlier, we are now only
> taking showstopper fixes. Beman?
>> We really need to figure out a better way of dealing with this...
> It currently requires a lot of discipline from each developer to make
> sure every change they apply to trunk also ends up in release. I wonder
> if commits to trunk to schedule a nag mail to be sent to the submitter a
> week later that says, "Did you check the tests? Did you merge to
> release?" Or open a track ticket that says, "merge changelist xxx to
I guess it's better to nag the maintainer of a library, given that
merging just once is a sensible strategy.
On which note -- do we have up-to-date list of maintainers? Or,
do we know the maintainer of libs/maintainers.txt? It appears to
contain entries where a different person is know to maintain that
library recently, or where the listed maintainer is known to be MIA,
or have officially declared he's not maintaining that library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk