Subject: Re: [boost] Library for configuration file parsing
From: Marsh Ray (marsh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-28 17:25:59
On 11/28/2010 02:21 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Regardless, even parse_config_file will often be more appropriate than
> using an embedded scripting language.
What I would really like is a clean and simple JSON library.
Last time I looked around (a year or two ago) it seemed like there were
a lot of 50-80% side projects, none of which gave me the warm fuzzies
about being tested and maintained. Many would parse but not generate, or
vice versa. The DOM v SAX architectural decisions seem relevant too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk