Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Bug Sprint] Final report for the (late 2010) Bug Sprint
From: Jim Bell (Jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-07 12:26:46

On 1:59 PM, Vicente Botet wrote:
> Marshall Clow-2 wrote:
>> Well, the bug sprint is over. [ But that doesn't mean you have to stop
>> fixing bugs if you don't want to! ]
>> So - what did people think went well during the bug sprint?
>> What went poorly?
>> What can we do better next time (assuming that there is a next time)?
> ...I would track in the daily reports the number of Patches.


> IMO a good
> measure of a good/bad Bug sprint should be the number of open Bugs, not the
> number of open tickets. In particular I will not count the Support, Task or
> Feature Requests tickets as they are not associated to a bad behavior of the
> libraries.


> [...]
> In addition to the Bug Sprint I would like we start an open activity that
> would add more regression tests. [...]

I think resources should first be spent making the existing regressions

And more regressions should flow out of valid bug reports. (See
Boost.Guild ticket handling

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at