Subject: Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB?
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-16 00:46:14
----- Original Message ----
> From: Boris Schaeling <boris_at_[hidden]>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:06:21 +0100, Artyom <artyomtnk_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi Artyom,
> > [...]I hadn't used OTL too much and studied it too deep but, as first shot:
> > CppDB supports MySQL, Sqlite3 and PostgreSQL natively and not via ODBC
> that's true - on Unix it requires setting up an ODBC infrastructure for these
> This might be a K.O. criterium for developers. But then altogether the library
> so many databases and is actively maintained for such a long time that I would
> it as a strong competitor to any Boost database library.
I would recommend to stay away from ODBC unless you have to. ODBC drivers are
crap (sorry) - during testing CppDB and ODBC I had found so many flaws that I
that ODBC is generally very bad way to go.
The reason for this is very simple - ODBC API is overcomplicated, so
writing a driver is very complex thing as a result too many drivers have very
As I mentioned Sqlite3 driver hadn't managed transactions, MS SQL/FreeTDS ODBC
Linux does not support Unicode. And so on.
So if you can avoid ODBC do it - its concept is great but the reality is not so.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk