Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Denis Shevchenko (for.dshevchenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 11:31:37

Next message: Matus Chochlik: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Previous message: Alexander Lamaison: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
In reply to: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"
Next in thread: Joel Falcou: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"
Reply: Joel Falcou: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"
Reply: TONGARI: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"

19.01.2011 20:27, Barend Gehrels Ð¿Ð¸ÑˆÐµÑ‚:
> For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
>
> As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
>
+1.

- Denis

Next message: Matus Chochlik: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Previous message: Alexander Lamaison: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
In reply to: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"
Next in thread: Joel Falcou: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"
Reply: Joel Falcou: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"
Reply: TONGARI: "Re: [boost] namespace boost?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk