Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 11:27:42
On 19-1-2011 17:19, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:09 +0800,
> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> Although cpp-netlib
>> is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name
>> for it. :D
> cpp-net? :-)
For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
We had the same thing, ggl (generic geometry library) became
Boost.Geometry because both generic and library were redundant.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk