Re: [boost] namespace boost?

Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 11:56:58

On 19/01/11 16:27, Barend Gehrels wrote:
>
>
> On 19-1-2011 17:19, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:09 +0800,
>> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>> Although cpp-netlib
>>> is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name
>>> for it. :D
>> cpp-net? :-)
>
> For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
>
> As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
>
> We had the same thing, ggl (generic geometry library) became
> Boost.Geometry because both generic and library were redundant.

Speaking of names and (my) personal preferences, Boost.Image
or Boost.Raster would be better than GIL.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org