Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 13:20:32
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:56:58 +0000,
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 19/01/11 16:27, Barend Gehrels wrote:
> > On 19-1-2011 17:19, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> >> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:09 +0800,
> >> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> >>> Although cpp-netlib
> >>> is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name
> >>> for it. :D
> >> cpp-net? :-)
> > For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
> > As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
> > We had the same thing, ggl (generic geometry library) became
> > Boost.Geometry because both generic and library were redundant.
> Speaking of names and (my) personal preferences, Boost.Image
> or Boost.Raster would be better than GIL.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk