Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Brent Spillner (spillner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 18:19:37

Next message: Brent Spillner: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Previous message: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] [process] Arguments and Context concepts"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Ramey: "[boost] namespace boost?"

On 19/01/11 at 7:58 PM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>That doesn't make me like the 'lib' name myself. Although cpp-netlib
>is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name
>for it. :D

When I first saw the name 'cpp-netlib' I assumed it was a numerical library. ;-)

Next message: Brent Spillner: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Previous message: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] [process] Arguments and Context concepts"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Ramey: "[boost] namespace boost?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk