Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-20 05:53:28
On 19/01/11 18:20, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:56:58 +0000,
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 19/01/11 16:27, Barend Gehrels wrote:
>>> On 19-1-2011 17:19, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:09 +0800,
>>>> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>>>> Although cpp-netlib
>>>>> is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name
>>>>> for it. :D
>>>> cpp-net? :-)
>>> For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
>>> As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
>>> We had the same thing, ggl (generic geometry library) became
>>> Boost.Geometry because both generic and library were redundant.
>> Speaking of names and (my) personal preferences, Boost.Image
>> or Boost.Raster would be better than GIL.
I don't want to be too poisonous here, wondering what would be a
procedure to rename library? A renaming review? Simple poll?
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk