Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] Brainstorming [WAS: Subject: Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library starts tomorrow]
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-14 13:19:59
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 17:14, Oliver Kowalke <k-oli_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> About the initial question, I've always thought that Boost.Process would
>> provide :
>> 1. A cross-platform way to manipulate processes (child processes)
>> managing their "life-time".
> 'Managing life-time' means stop, continue, kill children?
> 2. Maybe some platform-specific utilites.
>> 3. Easy Inter-process communication "would be cool" but as there is
>> library providing this feature, is not a show stopper for me.
Yes, in fact I'll use another high-level network library (for unrelated
reasons) in addition to interprocess (because I tried with an old version of
boost.process and already have the communication code, but boost.process was
buggy few years ago).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk