Re: [boost] [move] You can do it better: implementing push_back and handling implicit conversions

Subject: Re: [boost] [move] You can do it better: implementing push_back and handling implicit conversions
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-08 17:10:41

[Ion Gaztañaga]
> Problem: MSVC 10.0 (Visual 2010) with real rvalue references seems to have
> bugs and does not compile the test. I can't find a workaround, a future
> Service Pack might solve these errors, but maybe we should stick to
> emulation code in this compiler, unless someone could shed some light on
> this, of course.

Can you provide a minimal test case, demonstrating just the bug in question?

Thanks,
Stephan T. Lavavej
Visual C++ Libraries Developer