[boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review

Subject: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review
From: Anders Dalvander (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-12 09:09:11

On 20:59, Chad Nelson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:28:25 -0600
> Nevin Liber<nevin_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
>> This stuff is hard to get right.  You are better off not implementing
>> it.
>
> On the contrary. It's *because* it's hard to get right that it belongs
> in a library.

Yes, it belong in *a* library, but XInt is probably not the correct one.

It should probably be done by the allocator, as someone suggested earlier.

Regards,
Anders Dalvander

-- 
WWFSMD?