Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection...
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-16 14:18:04

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] OK to remove Concept related config macros?"
Previous message: Michael Matthews: "[boost] bcp (and config.hpp, user.hpp, shared_ptr.hpp) problem"
In reply to: John Maddock: "[boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection..."
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection..."
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection..."

On 16/03/2011 18:51, John Maddock wrote:
> Just a heads up, that the latest Boost.Config changes:
>
> * Remove the concept related macros.
> * Tighten up most of the C++0x related tests, with the result that some
> C++0x features that were previously enabled are no longer - this may
> also cause the Boost.Config tests to fail on some platforms.
> * Some C++0x features that were not previously enabled are now - because
> they were passing the Boost.Config tests - there's at least one case
> where this is causing regressions in other libraries - if any more pop
> up please let me know ASAP!

Any reason why decltype on MSVC10 is still not enabled?

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] OK to remove Concept related config macros?"
Previous message: Michael Matthews: "[boost] bcp (and config.hpp, user.hpp, shared_ptr.hpp) problem"
In reply to: John Maddock: "[boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection..."
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection..."
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection..."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk