Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 12:43:02

On 4/6/2011 2:14 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> You'll find a comparison in speed of all smart pointer types here and you
>> will see "special"& "simple" counted being slower than intrusive_ptr:
>> All tests were run on a PII-200 running Windows NT version 4.0
> IMO that means the results are meaningless.

Here's another one here comparing shared_ptr<>, intrusive_ptr<> and
garbage collected algorithms:


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at