Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request

Subject: Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 12:43:02

On 4/6/2011 2:14 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>
>> You'll find a comparison in speed of all smart pointer types here and you
>> will see "special"&  "simple" counted being slower than intrusive_ptr:
>> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/libs/smart_ptr/smarttests.htm
>
>> All tests were run on a PII-200 running Windows NT version 4.0
>
> IMO that means the results are meaningless.

Here's another one here comparing shared_ptr<>, intrusive_ptr<> and 
garbage collected algorithms:
http://hnxgc.harnixworld.com/benchmarks/GCBench/

-Phil