Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request

Subject: Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request
From: Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 12:58:47

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Phil Bouchard <philippe_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 4/6/2011 2:14 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>>
>>> You'll find a comparison in speed of all smart pointer types here and you
>>> will see "special"& Â "simple" counted being slower than intrusive_ptr:
>>> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/libs/smart_ptr/smarttests.htm
>>
>>> All tests were run on a PII-200 running Windows NT version 4.0
>>
>> IMO that means the results are meaningless.
>
> Here's another one here comparing shared_ptr<>, intrusive_ptr<> and garbage
> collected algorithms:
> http://hnxgc.harnixworld.com/benchmarks/GCBench/

What version of Boost was used?
Does it use make_shared?

Olaf