Subject: Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request
From: Olaf van der Spek (olafvdspek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 12:58:47
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Phil Bouchard <philippe_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 4/6/2011 2:14 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> You'll find a comparison in speed of all smart pointer types here and you
>>> will see "special"& Â "simple" counted being slower than intrusive_ptr:
>>> All tests were run on a PII-200 running Windows NT version 4.0
>> IMO that means the results are meaningless.
> Here's another one here comparing shared_ptr<>, intrusive_ptr<> and garbage
> collected algorithms:
What version of Boost was used?
Does it use make_shared?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk